View Full Version : The 14 MP is here!
MeanGene
04-06-2003, 11:12 PM
I would love to get my hands on one of these!
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0209/02092304kodakdcs14n.asp
MeanGene
04-06-2003, 11:12 PM
I would love to get my hands on one of these!
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0209/02092304kodakdcs14n.asp
MeanGene
04-06-2003, 11:12 PM
I would love to get my hands on one of these!
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0209/02092304kodakdcs14n.asp
StormShaman
04-06-2003, 11:15 PM
Damn! Any idea what the MSRP is?
StormShaman
04-06-2003, 11:15 PM
Damn! Any idea what the MSRP is?
StormShaman
04-06-2003, 11:15 PM
Damn! Any idea what the MSRP is?
nccanes
04-06-2003, 11:23 PM
Damn! Any idea what the MSRP is?
The estimated street price is near USD$4,000.
nccanes
04-06-2003, 11:23 PM
Damn! Any idea what the MSRP is?
The estimated street price is near USD$4,000.
nccanes
04-06-2003, 11:23 PM
Damn! Any idea what the MSRP is?
The estimated street price is near USD$4,000.
StormShaman
04-06-2003, 11:57 PM
Damn! Any idea what the MSRP is?
The estimated street price is near USD$4,000.
*whistle*
StormShaman
04-06-2003, 11:57 PM
Damn! Any idea what the MSRP is?
The estimated street price is near USD$4,000.
*whistle*
StormShaman
04-06-2003, 11:57 PM
Damn! Any idea what the MSRP is?
The estimated street price is near USD$4,000.
*whistle*
Guyute
04-07-2003, 08:38 AM
*whistle*
I'll 2nd that.
14 MP's, wow.
I'd LOVE me a digital SLR. whew. just can't see dropping 3k on one though.... when I'm in such desparate need of a 42" widescreen already. :p
Guyute
04-07-2003, 08:38 AM
*whistle*
I'll 2nd that.
14 MP's, wow.
I'd LOVE me a digital SLR. whew. just can't see dropping 3k on one though.... when I'm in such desparate need of a 42" widescreen already. :p
Guyute
04-07-2003, 08:38 AM
*whistle*
I'll 2nd that.
14 MP's, wow.
I'd LOVE me a digital SLR. whew. just can't see dropping 3k on one though.... when I'm in such desparate need of a 42" widescreen already. :p
VandyCane
04-07-2003, 12:57 PM
Since we are in the topic of digital cameras...
Three and a half years ago my husband bought me a Sony Mavica camera that I have loved dearly. Recently we lost our charger and the battery stopped holding its charge so I convinced him that we really should get a brand-new camera. He agreed that it would make a good mother's day present. So, which of the newer cameras would you recommend and why? $4,000 is a little out of my budget, lol. I was thinking more like $300-500.
VandyCane
04-07-2003, 12:57 PM
Since we are in the topic of digital cameras...
Three and a half years ago my husband bought me a Sony Mavica camera that I have loved dearly. Recently we lost our charger and the battery stopped holding its charge so I convinced him that we really should get a brand-new camera. He agreed that it would make a good mother's day present. So, which of the newer cameras would you recommend and why? $4,000 is a little out of my budget, lol. I was thinking more like $300-500.
VandyCane
04-07-2003, 12:57 PM
Since we are in the topic of digital cameras...
Three and a half years ago my husband bought me a Sony Mavica camera that I have loved dearly. Recently we lost our charger and the battery stopped holding its charge so I convinced him that we really should get a brand-new camera. He agreed that it would make a good mother's day present. So, which of the newer cameras would you recommend and why? $4,000 is a little out of my budget, lol. I was thinking more like $300-500.
Guyute
04-07-2003, 01:06 PM
I recently bought a Canon A40. 2.1 MP's, you can add a couple of lenses (macro, wide angle, telephoto) to it, which make it a little more adaptable.
Doesn't touch the 350mm on our Nikon, but like I said, I can't afford a digital SLR. :sad:
The A40 is a beaut, imo... and I found it for around $250 (I think, can't really remember now). Shell has taken some real good player shots, I'm sure if you've been in the ladies thread you've seen what the camera can do. I also use it a lot for closeups of my fish. does a pretty good job in macro mode, even w/out the macro lens. For what I wanted to do... it certainly does it. I had a smaller budget than 300-500 though. but, then again, why spend more if you don't need to. all depends on what you want.
here's one of my fish shots http://www.bellsouthpwp.com/g/u/guyute/fish/a40-aulonocara.jpg
Click Here for my fish page (http://www.bellsouthpwp.com/g/u/guyute/fish/tank.html) if you want to see more examples. I need to spend a day getting new shots, as the fish have grown, tanks have changed considerably, etc.. hehe. but, should give you an idea what the a40 does (and taking tank pics ain't easy. most cameras don't do too well)
Guyute
04-07-2003, 01:06 PM
I recently bought a Canon A40. 2.1 MP's, you can add a couple of lenses (macro, wide angle, telephoto) to it, which make it a little more adaptable.
Doesn't touch the 350mm on our Nikon, but like I said, I can't afford a digital SLR. :sad:
The A40 is a beaut, imo... and I found it for around $250 (I think, can't really remember now). Shell has taken some real good player shots, I'm sure if you've been in the ladies thread you've seen what the camera can do. I also use it a lot for closeups of my fish. does a pretty good job in macro mode, even w/out the macro lens. For what I wanted to do... it certainly does it. I had a smaller budget than 300-500 though. but, then again, why spend more if you don't need to. all depends on what you want.
here's one of my fish shots http://www.bellsouthpwp.com/g/u/guyute/fish/a40-aulonocara.jpg
Click Here for my fish page (http://www.bellsouthpwp.com/g/u/guyute/fish/tank.html) if you want to see more examples. I need to spend a day getting new shots, as the fish have grown, tanks have changed considerably, etc.. hehe. but, should give you an idea what the a40 does (and taking tank pics ain't easy. most cameras don't do too well)
Guyute
04-07-2003, 01:06 PM
I recently bought a Canon A40. 2.1 MP's, you can add a couple of lenses (macro, wide angle, telephoto) to it, which make it a little more adaptable.
Doesn't touch the 350mm on our Nikon, but like I said, I can't afford a digital SLR. :sad:
The A40 is a beaut, imo... and I found it for around $250 (I think, can't really remember now). Shell has taken some real good player shots, I'm sure if you've been in the ladies thread you've seen what the camera can do. I also use it a lot for closeups of my fish. does a pretty good job in macro mode, even w/out the macro lens. For what I wanted to do... it certainly does it. I had a smaller budget than 300-500 though. but, then again, why spend more if you don't need to. all depends on what you want.
here's one of my fish shots http://www.bellsouthpwp.com/g/u/guyute/fish/a40-aulonocara.jpg
Click Here for my fish page (http://www.bellsouthpwp.com/g/u/guyute/fish/tank.html) if you want to see more examples. I need to spend a day getting new shots, as the fish have grown, tanks have changed considerably, etc.. hehe. but, should give you an idea what the a40 does (and taking tank pics ain't easy. most cameras don't do too well)
Caniac
04-07-2003, 01:50 PM
I got a $90 HP Photosmart 318 for Christmas and have been very happy with it. It's a 2.1 megapixel. Doesn't have a zoom, well it has a 2x digital, but digital zoom's are worthless. But it does have a compact flash slot, so I got a 64 mb card. Takes flawless pictures indoors and out.
It's perfect for my little photos of friends and family and for making web graphics.
It does what I need it to do.
But as for the nicer camera's and especially that 14mp... I need a drooling smiley. :)
Caniac
04-07-2003, 01:50 PM
I got a $90 HP Photosmart 318 for Christmas and have been very happy with it. It's a 2.1 megapixel. Doesn't have a zoom, well it has a 2x digital, but digital zoom's are worthless. But it does have a compact flash slot, so I got a 64 mb card. Takes flawless pictures indoors and out.
It's perfect for my little photos of friends and family and for making web graphics.
It does what I need it to do.
But as for the nicer camera's and especially that 14mp... I need a drooling smiley. :)
Caniac
04-07-2003, 01:50 PM
I got a $90 HP Photosmart 318 for Christmas and have been very happy with it. It's a 2.1 megapixel. Doesn't have a zoom, well it has a 2x digital, but digital zoom's are worthless. But it does have a compact flash slot, so I got a 64 mb card. Takes flawless pictures indoors and out.
It's perfect for my little photos of friends and family and for making web graphics.
It does what I need it to do.
But as for the nicer camera's and especially that 14mp... I need a drooling smiley. :)
folgersnyourcup
04-07-2003, 02:23 PM
That camera is unbelievable. Hey Guyute, skip the 42 inch widescreen and go for the 34 incher. It's awesome! Sony KV-34XBR800 if you want to look it up. The picture's absolutely stunning. When you say 42 inch I'm assuming you mean either a plasma or a rear-projection. This one's a CRT tube television meaning very heavy but amazing colors, brightness, and viewing range. Just throwing that out there if you're looking to save some money. It would be cheaper than a 42 inch plasma but much more expensive than most 42 inch rear-projection sets.... I dunno if you were serious about getting one or just joking, hehe, but I thought if I could help you out I should. It's definitely got a big picture, the widescreen picture is equivalent to what you would see on a 37 inch set, and the 4:3 picture with black bars on the left and right is a 28 inch picture though it can be stretched or zoomed. As you can probably tell from my knowledge on the set, I've got it and it's unbelievable. Let me know if I can help with anything at all!
folgersnyourcup
04-07-2003, 02:23 PM
That camera is unbelievable. Hey Guyute, skip the 42 inch widescreen and go for the 34 incher. It's awesome! Sony KV-34XBR800 if you want to look it up. The picture's absolutely stunning. When you say 42 inch I'm assuming you mean either a plasma or a rear-projection. This one's a CRT tube television meaning very heavy but amazing colors, brightness, and viewing range. Just throwing that out there if you're looking to save some money. It would be cheaper than a 42 inch plasma but much more expensive than most 42 inch rear-projection sets.... I dunno if you were serious about getting one or just joking, hehe, but I thought if I could help you out I should. It's definitely got a big picture, the widescreen picture is equivalent to what you would see on a 37 inch set, and the 4:3 picture with black bars on the left and right is a 28 inch picture though it can be stretched or zoomed. As you can probably tell from my knowledge on the set, I've got it and it's unbelievable. Let me know if I can help with anything at all!
folgersnyourcup
04-07-2003, 02:23 PM
That camera is unbelievable. Hey Guyute, skip the 42 inch widescreen and go for the 34 incher. It's awesome! Sony KV-34XBR800 if you want to look it up. The picture's absolutely stunning. When you say 42 inch I'm assuming you mean either a plasma or a rear-projection. This one's a CRT tube television meaning very heavy but amazing colors, brightness, and viewing range. Just throwing that out there if you're looking to save some money. It would be cheaper than a 42 inch plasma but much more expensive than most 42 inch rear-projection sets.... I dunno if you were serious about getting one or just joking, hehe, but I thought if I could help you out I should. It's definitely got a big picture, the widescreen picture is equivalent to what you would see on a 37 inch set, and the 4:3 picture with black bars on the left and right is a 28 inch picture though it can be stretched or zoomed. As you can probably tell from my knowledge on the set, I've got it and it's unbelievable. Let me know if I can help with anything at all!
Guyute
04-07-2003, 02:48 PM
a 42" plasma??? lol. I wish. No way am I getting a $5000 set in the house though. lmao.
those haven't come down nearly enough in price yet. I was looking at a rear projection 42" widescreen (JVC). I have a JVC screen now and absolutely love it. Sony's are very nice as well... but come with a very inflated price tag, imo.
actually, after a quick search of local retailers, the 48" JVC is down to $1700. ;)
I wasn't joking. I've been dying for a nice widescreen tv. but, it'll probably have to wait, as we're going to the Caymans next month, and that'll about be the cost of a new screen. heh
wow, sony's price on that 34 trinitron is $2500!! :eek2:
preciate the tip, but think I'll probably gun for sticking with JVC ;)
Guyute
04-07-2003, 02:48 PM
a 42" plasma??? lol. I wish. No way am I getting a $5000 set in the house though. lmao.
those haven't come down nearly enough in price yet. I was looking at a rear projection 42" widescreen (JVC). I have a JVC screen now and absolutely love it. Sony's are very nice as well... but come with a very inflated price tag, imo.
actually, after a quick search of local retailers, the 48" JVC is down to $1700. ;)
I wasn't joking. I've been dying for a nice widescreen tv. but, it'll probably have to wait, as we're going to the Caymans next month, and that'll about be the cost of a new screen. heh
wow, sony's price on that 34 trinitron is $2500!! :eek2:
preciate the tip, but think I'll probably gun for sticking with JVC ;)
Guyute
04-07-2003, 02:48 PM
a 42" plasma??? lol. I wish. No way am I getting a $5000 set in the house though. lmao.
those haven't come down nearly enough in price yet. I was looking at a rear projection 42" widescreen (JVC). I have a JVC screen now and absolutely love it. Sony's are very nice as well... but come with a very inflated price tag, imo.
actually, after a quick search of local retailers, the 48" JVC is down to $1700. ;)
I wasn't joking. I've been dying for a nice widescreen tv. but, it'll probably have to wait, as we're going to the Caymans next month, and that'll about be the cost of a new screen. heh
wow, sony's price on that 34 trinitron is $2500!! :eek2:
preciate the tip, but think I'll probably gun for sticking with JVC ;)
folgersnyourcup
04-07-2003, 02:55 PM
JVC's good and 1700's not bad at all for a 48 inch rear-projection widescreen set. Yeah, the MSRP is 2500 for the Sony set but it can be found for 2000 (apparently even retail stores like Circuit City are glad to mark it down to this price if you bring in a print out of an internet site with that price listed on it). I was dumb, didn't know I could do that, and paid full-retail price. Gahaaa!!!!!! :( But good luck in your search! Let me knwo if I can be of any assistance!
folgersnyourcup
04-07-2003, 02:55 PM
JVC's good and 1700's not bad at all for a 48 inch rear-projection widescreen set. Yeah, the MSRP is 2500 for the Sony set but it can be found for 2000 (apparently even retail stores like Circuit City are glad to mark it down to this price if you bring in a print out of an internet site with that price listed on it). I was dumb, didn't know I could do that, and paid full-retail price. Gahaaa!!!!!! :( But good luck in your search! Let me knwo if I can be of any assistance!
folgersnyourcup
04-07-2003, 02:55 PM
JVC's good and 1700's not bad at all for a 48 inch rear-projection widescreen set. Yeah, the MSRP is 2500 for the Sony set but it can be found for 2000 (apparently even retail stores like Circuit City are glad to mark it down to this price if you bring in a print out of an internet site with that price listed on it). I was dumb, didn't know I could do that, and paid full-retail price. Gahaaa!!!!!! :( But good luck in your search! Let me knwo if I can be of any assistance!
We have been in the market for a widescreen as well, but I think that we have definitely decided on getting a DLP front projector. It is a bit more expensive that the price range you two are discussing, but it can stretch up to 300", and eventually we want to build a movie room. :)
We have been in the market for a widescreen as well, but I think that we have definitely decided on getting a DLP front projector. It is a bit more expensive that the price range you two are discussing, but it can stretch up to 300", and eventually we want to build a movie room. :)
We have been in the market for a widescreen as well, but I think that we have definitely decided on getting a DLP front projector. It is a bit more expensive that the price range you two are discussing, but it can stretch up to 300", and eventually we want to build a movie room. :)
folgersnyourcup
04-07-2003, 05:02 PM
Those are awesome. Definitely more expensive but if you have the space it's well worth it I'm sure!
folgersnyourcup
04-07-2003, 05:02 PM
Those are awesome. Definitely more expensive but if you have the space it's well worth it I'm sure!
folgersnyourcup
04-07-2003, 05:02 PM
Those are awesome. Definitely more expensive but if you have the space it's well worth it I'm sure!
MeanGene
04-07-2003, 06:32 PM
Since we are in the topic of digital cameras...
Three and a half years ago my husband bought me a Sony Mavica camera that I have loved dearly. Recently we lost our charger and the battery stopped holding its charge so I convinced him that we really should get a brand-new camera. He agreed that it would make a good mother's day present. So, which of the newer cameras would you recommend and why? $4,000 is a little out of my budget, lol. I was thinking more like $300-500.
You can get 4 megapixel camera for around $300.00. You want a camera with optical zoom. The zoom I have seen in this price range is about 3 or 4 times optical zoom. Don't pay any attention to digitla zoom. It is just like cropping the picture and you lose picture quality with digital, but not optical zoom.
Prices seem to drop every week. Check sunday's paper and compare prices. Places like Staples, Best Buy, and Circuit City do price matching and a lot of times have coupons. You can get some really good deals. I hope I get my Gainsharing check this week so I can get a new camera!
MeanGene
04-07-2003, 06:32 PM
Since we are in the topic of digital cameras...
Three and a half years ago my husband bought me a Sony Mavica camera that I have loved dearly. Recently we lost our charger and the battery stopped holding its charge so I convinced him that we really should get a brand-new camera. He agreed that it would make a good mother's day present. So, which of the newer cameras would you recommend and why? $4,000 is a little out of my budget, lol. I was thinking more like $300-500.
You can get 4 megapixel camera for around $300.00. You want a camera with optical zoom. The zoom I have seen in this price range is about 3 or 4 times optical zoom. Don't pay any attention to digitla zoom. It is just like cropping the picture and you lose picture quality with digital, but not optical zoom.
Prices seem to drop every week. Check sunday's paper and compare prices. Places like Staples, Best Buy, and Circuit City do price matching and a lot of times have coupons. You can get some really good deals. I hope I get my Gainsharing check this week so I can get a new camera!
MeanGene
04-07-2003, 06:32 PM
Since we are in the topic of digital cameras...
Three and a half years ago my husband bought me a Sony Mavica camera that I have loved dearly. Recently we lost our charger and the battery stopped holding its charge so I convinced him that we really should get a brand-new camera. He agreed that it would make a good mother's day present. So, which of the newer cameras would you recommend and why? $4,000 is a little out of my budget, lol. I was thinking more like $300-500.
You can get 4 megapixel camera for around $300.00. You want a camera with optical zoom. The zoom I have seen in this price range is about 3 or 4 times optical zoom. Don't pay any attention to digitla zoom. It is just like cropping the picture and you lose picture quality with digital, but not optical zoom.
Prices seem to drop every week. Check sunday's paper and compare prices. Places like Staples, Best Buy, and Circuit City do price matching and a lot of times have coupons. You can get some really good deals. I hope I get my Gainsharing check this week so I can get a new camera!
VandyCane
04-07-2003, 08:22 PM
Thanks for the advice. That's the one thing about the Mavica, the resolution is a crummy .9 MP, but I do have a 10x zoom that is awesome. I guess I better start doing my research!
VandyCane
04-07-2003, 08:22 PM
Thanks for the advice. That's the one thing about the Mavica, the resolution is a crummy .9 MP, but I do have a 10x zoom that is awesome. I guess I better start doing my research!
VandyCane
04-07-2003, 08:22 PM
Thanks for the advice. That's the one thing about the Mavica, the resolution is a crummy .9 MP, but I do have a 10x zoom that is awesome. I guess I better start doing my research!
MeanGene
04-07-2003, 10:15 PM
Thanks for the advice. That's the one thing about the Mavica, the resolution is a crummy .9 MP, but I do have a 10x zoom that is awesome. I guess I better start doing my research!
That is what we have a work. They got them so that the teachers can keep the disks on file with the childrens pictures and it is easy to upload. That is what they used to think anyway. We have the newer Mavicas now that use the big 3 1/2 disks, but they can use memory sticks too. I may be wrong, but I do not think the zoom is 10x in the new cameras.
I prefer the smaller cameras personally. The mavicas are a little too bulky for my taste. I do like the big LCD though.
MeanGene
04-07-2003, 10:15 PM
Thanks for the advice. That's the one thing about the Mavica, the resolution is a crummy .9 MP, but I do have a 10x zoom that is awesome. I guess I better start doing my research!
That is what we have a work. They got them so that the teachers can keep the disks on file with the childrens pictures and it is easy to upload. That is what they used to think anyway. We have the newer Mavicas now that use the big 3 1/2 disks, but they can use memory sticks too. I may be wrong, but I do not think the zoom is 10x in the new cameras.
I prefer the smaller cameras personally. The mavicas are a little too bulky for my taste. I do like the big LCD though.
MeanGene
04-07-2003, 10:15 PM
Thanks for the advice. That's the one thing about the Mavica, the resolution is a crummy .9 MP, but I do have a 10x zoom that is awesome. I guess I better start doing my research!
That is what we have a work. They got them so that the teachers can keep the disks on file with the childrens pictures and it is easy to upload. That is what they used to think anyway. We have the newer Mavicas now that use the big 3 1/2 disks, but they can use memory sticks too. I may be wrong, but I do not think the zoom is 10x in the new cameras.
I prefer the smaller cameras personally. The mavicas are a little too bulky for my taste. I do like the big LCD though.
AbNormal27
04-08-2003, 10:54 AM
The A40 is a beaut, imo... and I found it for around $250 (I think, can't really remember now). Shell has taken some real good player shots, I'm sure if you've been in the ladies thread you've seen what the camera can do. I also use it a lot for closeups of my fish. does a pretty good job in macro mode, even w/out the macro lens. For what I wanted to do... it certainly does it. I had a smaller budget than 300-500 though. but, then again, why spend more if you don't need to. all depends on what you want.....but, should give you an idea what the a40 does (and taking tank pics ain't easy. most cameras don't do too well)
I have used the A40 for many projects (I'm a graphic designer / potential mental patient), and can confirm Guy's comments. I have seen and played with the Kodak Pro DCS-14n, and can tell that the detail you can pull from it is comparable to drum scanning a transparency at high resolution! It is sah-weeeet, but the price tag is scary. I think I'll stick with the A40, well, at least for the next 2 weeks until something better comes out ;) LOL.
Aaryn
AbNormal27
04-08-2003, 10:54 AM
The A40 is a beaut, imo... and I found it for around $250 (I think, can't really remember now). Shell has taken some real good player shots, I'm sure if you've been in the ladies thread you've seen what the camera can do. I also use it a lot for closeups of my fish. does a pretty good job in macro mode, even w/out the macro lens. For what I wanted to do... it certainly does it. I had a smaller budget than 300-500 though. but, then again, why spend more if you don't need to. all depends on what you want.....but, should give you an idea what the a40 does (and taking tank pics ain't easy. most cameras don't do too well)
I have used the A40 for many projects (I'm a graphic designer / potential mental patient), and can confirm Guy's comments. I have seen and played with the Kodak Pro DCS-14n, and can tell that the detail you can pull from it is comparable to drum scanning a transparency at high resolution! It is sah-weeeet, but the price tag is scary. I think I'll stick with the A40, well, at least for the next 2 weeks until something better comes out ;) LOL.
Aaryn
AbNormal27
04-08-2003, 10:54 AM
The A40 is a beaut, imo... and I found it for around $250 (I think, can't really remember now). Shell has taken some real good player shots, I'm sure if you've been in the ladies thread you've seen what the camera can do. I also use it a lot for closeups of my fish. does a pretty good job in macro mode, even w/out the macro lens. For what I wanted to do... it certainly does it. I had a smaller budget than 300-500 though. but, then again, why spend more if you don't need to. all depends on what you want.....but, should give you an idea what the a40 does (and taking tank pics ain't easy. most cameras don't do too well)
I have used the A40 for many projects (I'm a graphic designer / potential mental patient), and can confirm Guy's comments. I have seen and played with the Kodak Pro DCS-14n, and can tell that the detail you can pull from it is comparable to drum scanning a transparency at high resolution! It is sah-weeeet, but the price tag is scary. I think I'll stick with the A40, well, at least for the next 2 weeks until something better comes out ;) LOL.
Aaryn
tommy
05-09-2004, 10:18 PM
To revive an old topic, the Canon PowerShot A70 is going for about $230 at Best Buy, and my friend's dad let me use his A70 for prom on friday night... I really liked it... It falls with in the pixel range that I'm looking for, easy to take and scroll through pictures, pretty good zoom, and from what I can tell, great pictures. Anybody else have any ideas on if it's worth it? I.e., is there anything comparable that's equal or a better deal? I'm looking for the $250-$300 range, but a little bit on either side of that margin is good... I'm taking into consideration this thread up to this point, but obviously new technology is coming out left and right! (for example, I'm also looking at the Canon S400 and the Olympus C-5000)
tommy
05-09-2004, 10:18 PM
To revive an old topic, the Canon PowerShot A70 is going for about $230 at Best Buy, and my friend's dad let me use his A70 for prom on friday night... I really liked it... It falls with in the pixel range that I'm looking for, easy to take and scroll through pictures, pretty good zoom, and from what I can tell, great pictures. Anybody else have any ideas on if it's worth it? I.e., is there anything comparable that's equal or a better deal? I'm looking for the $250-$300 range, but a little bit on either side of that margin is good... I'm taking into consideration this thread up to this point, but obviously new technology is coming out left and right! (for example, I'm also looking at the Canon S400 and the Olympus C-5000)
4DFan
05-10-2004, 09:52 AM
I have a couple of coworkers that got Olympus C-series ultra zooms for Christmas. Both of them really like the camera for flexibility yet compact size. It looks like olympus now has a newer model out. It has a 10x optical zoom and is a 4 MP camera.
http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/cpg_product_lobbypage.asp?l=1&p=16&bc=2&product=959
4DFan
05-10-2004, 09:52 AM
I have a couple of coworkers that got Olympus C-series ultra zooms for Christmas. Both of them really like the camera for flexibility yet compact size. It looks like olympus now has a newer model out. It has a 10x optical zoom and is a 4 MP camera.
http://www.olympusamerica.com/cpg_section/cpg_product_lobbypage.asp?l=1&p=16&bc=2&product=959
vBulletin® v3.6.8, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.