PDA

View Full Version : RIP to "Distinct Kicking Motion"


livinthedream
02-20-2008, 04:05 PM
Mods feel free to move this into an appropriate thread:

http://blogs.newsobserver.com/canes/index.php/canes?title=just_for_kicks&more=1&c=1&tb=1&pb=1


While the Hurricanes didn't make a deal at the GM meetings this week in Florida — "A lot of talk, a lot of huddling and not a whole lot done," general manager Jim Rutherford said Wednesday as he returned to Carolina — there was one big change at the meetings, and it had something to do with the Hurricanes.

Andrew Ladd's second goal against the Boston Bruins last week, which deflected off his skate and over Bruins goalie Alex Auld, helped prompt a new standard for kicked-in goals.

As long as the player's skate remains on the ice, he can turn his skate or even slide his skate to redirect the puck. That guideline replaces the "distinct kicking motion" previously used for rulings.

"When you look at Ladd's goal," Rutherford said, "that's the definition of a good goal."

That change is immediate. Two other changes will take effect next season: Faceoffs after shots that deflect off the goalpost or crossbar and out of play will remain in the offensive zone, and all faceoffs after penalties will take place in the power-play team's offensive zone.

The NHL also considered moving to one-minute penalties in overtime, Rutherford said, but with no decision in that area.



Now that rule I think I can actually understand.

nccanes
02-20-2008, 04:07 PM
I hope they realize that the debate will now be over whether or not the blade leaves the ice. :lol: But it's a start.

SouthernHockeyChick
02-20-2008, 04:09 PM
all faceoffs after penalties will take place in the power-play team's offensive zone.

As if our PK wasn't bad enough...we're screwed.

livinthedream
02-20-2008, 04:16 PM
OTOH, could help us on power plays, it ensures we at least get into the offensive zone once.

LostTexan
02-20-2008, 05:13 PM
Didn't we have a goal waived off earlier in the season because a player was making a "hockey stop" and the puck hit off his skate? Can we get that goal credited back?

Seriously though I think this rule is easier to understand but personally I would have preferred to see the rule as "you cannot add momentum to the puck with your skate" but thats just me.

KaniacFever
02-20-2008, 06:01 PM
Hopefully that will clear up some gray areas, although, the officials we seem to be putting out, I'm sure they will find something to screw up.

aldamon
02-20-2008, 06:06 PM
I hope they realize that the debate will now be over whether or not the blade leaves the ice. :lol: But it's a start.

They can look for blood like with the high stick call :D. Otherwise, GOAL!!!

puck_it
02-21-2008, 11:12 AM
i moved all the fun stuff out.

it's still around in the vip forum :smoke:;)